The liaisons can be changed with officers who will report on to the White Home as a substitute of the companies to which they’re assigned.
Beforehand the liaisons labored along side the White Home’s Workplace of Presidential Personnel and the companies they served, whereas in the end reporting to the companies’ heads. With this modification, the liaisons will as a substitute report on to the White Home. Liaisons will be liable for helping the White Home in inserting political appointees at companies.
“Not a good suggestion on his half,” a White Home official informed CNN on the time. “Going to get himself and lots of people in hassle.”
However the next month, the presidential personnel workplace distributed a brand new questionnaire to candidates making use of to affix Trump’s administration that asks what a part of his marketing campaign message “most appealed” to them and why.
Whereas it isn’t uncommon for presidential administrations to vet political appointees for ideological or coverage alignment, the questionnaire beforehand utilized by the Trump White Home didn’t ask for candidates’ views about Trump or his marketing campaign. Trump’s identify doesn’t seem as soon as on the earlier questionnaire. It now seems 5 occasions.
For the reason that coronavirus pandemic started, the personnel workplace has put in a number of political aides at companies just like the Division of Well being and Human Companies. A kind of aides, Michael Caputo, just lately introduced he takes a two-month go away of absence after apologizing for a Fb video wherein he went on a rant in opposition to authorities scientists.
Shortly earlier than that, Meals and Drug Administration Commissioner Stephen Hahn eliminated a spokesperson, Emily Miller, at his company after solely a matter of days. Miller was a political appointee, so she remained on the company and not using a clear job.
Each Caputo and Miller have been positioned of their jobs by McEntee’s workplace.
Trump’s allies have lengthy supplied him with lists — not all the time solicited — of individuals they’ve recognized as disloyal and the names of these they are saying would work higher towards advancing his agenda.
Excessive loyalty assessments, nevertheless, hampered hiring in the beginning of Trump’s presidency, when candidates have been typically nixed for offenses as minor as anti-Trump tweets of their pasts.