Australian man jailed after stomping on pregnant Muslim girl

[ad_1]

Rana Elasmar, a mom of 4, was 38 weeks pregnant when the assault happened final November, in keeping with CNN affiliate 9 Information. She was sitting in a Sydney cafe, carrying a hijab, when Stipe Lozina approached her desk.

After briefly chatting with her, Lozina punched Elasmar a number of instances and stomped on her head when she fell to the bottom. Elasmar’s associates and different patrons leapt from their seats to restrain him.

Lozina allegedly made a racist comment earlier than the unprovoked assault, in keeping with 9 Information. Elasmar advised 9 Information that she had been centered on defending her unborn child.

She suffered minor accidents within the assault and her son was unhurt.

“Should you really feel the proper to bodily or verbally abuse any individual who seems a bit totally different than you, then Australia’s not the proper nation for you,” she advised reporters exterior courtroom final month.

Months after the assault, Elasmar was nonetheless experiencing the bodily and psychological results, her sister advised CNN affiliate Seven Information in June.
Lozina pleaded responsible to assault, however he claimed it was not an Islamophobic or racist assault. “I do not hate them, however I do not get together with them. I’ve acquired no enterprise with them,” Lozina mentioned in courtroom, in keeping with 9 Information.

On Thursday, he was sentenced to a most three years in jail, with a non-parole interval of two years.

[ad_2]

Nxivm: Seagram heiress Clare Bronfman jailed in ‘intercourse cult’ case

[ad_1]

Clare Bronfman at plea hearing last yearPicture copyright
Reuters

Picture caption

Clare Bronfman stated she was “deeply sorry” for her function within the group

US heiress Clare Bronfman has been sentenced to 6 years and 9 months in jail for her function within the Nxivm intercourse trafficking group.

Bronfman, inheritor to the Seagram liquor fortune and a benefactor of Nxivm chief Keith Raniere, pleaded responsible in April 2019 to harbouring migrants for unpaid “labour and providers”.

She additionally admitted to bank card fraud.

She was taken into custody to start her jail time period instantly after the sentencing in Brooklyn, New York.

Writing to the court docket final month, Bronfman stated she “by no means meant to harm anybody, nevertheless I’ve, and for this I’m deeply sorry”.

Nevertheless, she stated Nxivm had “significantly modified my life for the higher” and that she would not denounce its chief Raniere.

Nxivm – pronounced “Nexium” – was began in 1998 as a self-help programme. It stated it labored with greater than 16,000 individuals.

Extra on Nxivm:

On its web site, Nxivm described itself as a “neighborhood guided by humanitarian ideas that search to empower individuals and reply vital questions on what it means to be human”.

Regardless of its tagline of “working to construct a greater world”, Raniere was final yr convicted of overseeing a “slave and grasp” system inside the group.

The trial final yr heard that Nxivm operated like a cult. Prosecutors instructed the court docket that members fashioned a secret sorority of brainwashed “slaves” who have been branded with Raniere’s initials and compelled to have intercourse with him.

Bronfman was on Nxivm’s govt board, and gave Raniere tens of hundreds of thousands of {dollars} to run the group’s intensive self-improvement lessons. She additionally paid for the group’s attorneys when a lawsuit was filed towards them.

Picture copyright
Keith Raniere Conversations/Youtube

Picture caption

Keith Raniere, the chief of Nxivm, was convicted final yr

Counsel appearing for Bronfman argued that she ought to be given a lenient sentence as a result of she wasn’t immediately concerned in probably the most severe allegations towards Nxivm, and that she has a pre-existing well being situation that would make her extra susceptible to coronavirus in jail.

Nevertheless, prosecutors stated she ought to be given a severe punishment as a result of “Raniere wouldn’t have been in a position to commit the crimes with which he was convicted have been it not for highly effective allies like Bronfman”.

[ad_2]

Ren Zhiqiang: Chinese language tycoon who criticized Xi Jinping’s dealing with of coronavirus jailed for 18 years

[ad_1]

Ren Zhiqiang, a retired real-estate tycoon with shut ties to senior Chinese language officers, disappeared in March after he allegedly penned a scathing essay that month criticizing Xi’s response to the coronavirus epidemic. He was later charged with corruption-related offenses.

On Tuesday, a court docket in Beijing discovered Ren responsible on a number of costs, together with embezzling some $16.three million (110.6 million yuan) in public funds, accepting bribes, and abuse of energy that induced losses totaling $17.2 million (116.7 million yuan) for the state-owned property firm that he as soon as headed.

Judges sentenced him to 18 years in jail and imposed a tremendous of $620,000 (4.2 million yuan). The court docket stated he “voluntarily confessed all of his crimes” and “was prepared to simply accept the court docket’s verdict in spite of everything of his unlawful features have been recovered.”

China’s court docket system has a conviction price of round 99%, in keeping with authorized observers, and corruption costs are sometimes used to go after Communist Social gathering insiders who fall afoul of the management.

Ren’s conviction and heavy sentence seems designed to ship a message to different members of the Chinese language elite that any public criticism or defiance of Xi won’t be tolerated, as Beijing continues to take care of the fallout of the pandemic and faces intense worldwide strain from Washington and others.

‘The Cannon’

Born into the Communist Social gathering’s ruling elite, the 69-year-old Ren had usually been outspoken on Chinese language politics, excess of is often allowed within the authoritarian state.

His forthrightness earned him the nickname “The Cannon” on Chinese language social media.

Within the essay printed in March, extensively attributed to Ren, the creator lashed out on the get together’s crackdown on press freedom and intolerance of dissent. Whereas the essay didn’t point out Xi by identify, it obliquely referred to the nation’s high chief as a power-hungry “clown.”

“I noticed not an emperor standing there exhibiting his ‘new garments,’ however a clown who stripped off his garments and insisted on persevering with being an emperor,” Ren allegedly wrote of Xi’s tackle to 170,000 officers throughout the nation at a mass video convention on epidemic management measures on February 23.

The essay went on to accuse the Communist Social gathering of placing its personal pursuits above the protection of the Chinese language individuals, to safe its rule.

“And not using a media representing the pursuits of the individuals by publishing the precise info, the individuals’s lives are being ravaged by each the virus and the foremost sickness of the system,” Ren allegedly wrote.

Quickly after the essay was printed on-line, Ren disappeared, and kin feared he had been detained. Authorities confirmed Ren was being investigated on corruption associated costs in early April, and expelled the longtime member from the Communist Social gathering in July, paving the way in which for his legal prosecution.

This isn’t the primary time Ren ran afoul of the Chinese language management for talking his thoughts.

In 2016, he was disciplined after questioning on social media Xi’s calls for that Chinese language state media should keep completely loyal to the get together. He was placed on a 12 months’s probation for his get together membership and his wildly fashionable account on Weibo, China’s Twitter-like platform, was shuttered.

This time, nevertheless, there seems to be no second probability for Ren. If he serves his full sentence, he will probably be in his late 80s by the point he’s launched.

CNN’s James Griffiths, Nectar Gan and Ben Westcott contributed reporting.

[ad_2]

Harvey Weinstein: Jailed film producer stripped of honorary CBE

[ad_1]

Bob Weinstein, Harvey Weinstein and Sir Philip Thomas in 2004Picture copyright
Getty Photographs

Picture caption

Weinstein (centre) with brother Bob and Sir Philip Thomas, former British Consul-Normal in New York, in 2004

Disgraced film producer Harvey Weinstein has been stripped of his honorary CBE following his conviction for rape and sexual assault.

An official announcement in The London Gazette confirms that the Queen has annulled his appointment as a Commander of the Order of the British Empire.

The choice was made at a latest assembly of the Honours Forfeiture Committee, which is unbiased from authorities.

Weinstein was awarded the CBE in 2004.

Weinstein was sentenced to 23 years in jail in March. It adopted an investigation by the New York Occasions in Oct 2017 that printed accusations from a number of girls that the now 68-year-old producer had abused or harassed them.

The removing of Weinstein’s CBE for providers to the movie trade follows the 2017 rescinding of the Fellowship he acquired from the British Movie Institute (BFI) in 2002.

  • Harvey Weinstein jailed for 23 years in rape trial
  • Weinstein convicted of rape and sexual assault

The Honours Forfeiture Committee meets when required to think about whether or not recipients are responsible of behaviour “deemed to carry the honours system into disrepute”.

These from whom it has stripped honours previously embody entertainer Rolf Harris, who misplaced his CBE in 2015 after being jailed for 12 indecent assaults the earlier 12 months.

In 2012 Fred Goodwin, the previous chief government of the Royal Financial institution of Scotland, had his knighthood eliminated attributable to his position within the collapse of the financial institution.

Weinstein faces additional felony prices for rape and sexual assault in Los Angeles, although extradition proceedings have been put again to December final month as a result of coronavirus pandemic.

Why has the choice taken this lengthy?

Evaluation by Lizo Mzimba, leisure correspondent

Picture copyright
Getty Photographs

Picture caption

Harvey Weinstein pictured exterior a Manhattan court docket home in February

It is unsurprising that Harvey Weinstein, as soon as one among Hollywood’s strongest figures, has lastly been stripped of an honorary award from the Queen.

His publicity as a prolific predator shocked the world and added international momentum to the already present MeToo motion.

Nevertheless as the primary public allegations have been made nearly three years in the past, many shall be disillusioned that the removing of his CBE has taken this lengthy.

For apparent causes, the workings of the Honours Forfeiture Committee are secret and confidential.

However the committee’s publicly printed standards for the rescinding of an honour embody instances the place a person has been convicted of a felony offence and sentenced to greater than three months in jail.

That implies that when criminals prices or a trial are doubtless or pending, the committee is understandably reluctant to take motion till that course of is full, nonetheless overwhelming the proof or public opinion could also be.

Though the committee was nearly actually reluctant to take motion whereas a authorized course of was underway, it couldn’t have been unaware of the revulsion many felt at Weinstein nonetheless persevering with to carry an honour at the moment.

Whereas many people and our bodies wrote to the Prime Minister demanding the revocation of Weinstein’s CBE, the removing of an honour is definitely a call that is unbiased of the federal government and Downing Road.

It is also value noting {that a} case as excessive profile as Weinstein’s was at all times going to be on the Forfeiture Committee’s radar, with or with out calls from the general public or MPs. And that the choice to strip the previous of the movie producer is not in direct response to those calls for.

As quickly because the Weinstein accusations turned headline information, the committee can have identified they might be sooner or later be contemplating whether or not or not there was clear, unambiguous proof that he’d introduced the honours system into disrepute.

Nevertheless many will imagine that the committee ought to have been poised to make a speedy choice and ship a swift sign as soon as he was convicted in February. And can really feel that even with a system slowed by Covid, that it nonetheless should not have taken greater than six months to rescind the CBE of a convicted intercourse offender.

Observe us on Fb, or on Twitter @BBCNewsEnts. When you have a narrative suggestion e-mail



[ad_2]

WP2Social Auto Publish Powered By : XYZScripts.com